Contributed Papers

 

Session I - Room 203

 

8:00 - 8:15   The Impact of KTEM on Preservice Elementary Teachers

  Barbara Boschmans, Plymouth State University*

  April Hoffmeister, University of Memphis

  Michele Iiams, University of North Dakota

  Hortensia Soto-Johnson, University of Northern Colorado

  Todd Oberg, Illinois College

 

Abstract:  Research regarding preservice teachers' beliefs about mathematics and the teaching of mathematics has demonstrated that students' beliefs are deeply rooted and change requires "significant interference" (Lappan, et al.,1988).  In this presentation we report the results of our attempt to change the attitudes and beliefs of preservice elementary teachers at five universities through use of excerpts from Liping Ma's (1999) book, Knowing and Teaching Elementary Mathematics (KTEM).  Through the analysis of writing assignments, pre- and post-surveys, and subtraction and multiplication pre- and post-tests, we demonstrate how KTEM provided a catalyst for change in the attitudes and beliefs of our preservice elementary teachers.

 

8:20 - 8:35   Some insights into students’ minds...

                     (What ARE they thinking about mathematics?)

                     Karin Vorwerk, Westfield State College

 

Abstract:  During spring term 2006, I conducted a survey of over 650 students, mostly non-math majors, enrolled in lower-level math classes.  The questions I asked included both quantitatively-scored items and qualitatively-scored items.  The results showed several unexpected trends, some of which run counter to intuition and conventional wisdom.  In several questions that were designed to test students’ predisposition toward math, I found that of all majors at our college, education majors had a statistically significantly worst attitude toward math.  Obviously, this result causes some concern for our educational system’s future.  In my talk, I will discuss these and other study results.  I will also share my observations and discuss their implications on such diverse areas as: course design, curriculum development, hiring of new faculty, and improving students’ attitude towards math.


8:40 - 8:55   Against the Current: Electing to Study

                     Mathematics Since 1980 (Preliminary Report)

                     Robert Vaden-Goad, Southern Connecticut State University

 

Abstract:  Since the end of the so-called Sputnik Era, there has been a catastrophic decline in the number of highly capable, US born, publicly educated persons electing to study mathematics and pursuing that study to the completion of the Ph.D. A number of contributing factors have been identified. However, even during these times a number of such persons have still decided to pursue such study. An understanding of the motivations and individual histories of these individuals contributes to an understanding of the "comparative advantage" of mathematics in attracting such individuals to the field.

 

 

Session II - Room 205

 

8:00 - 8:15   Trigonometric Identities on a Graphing Calculator

                     Joan Weiss, Fairfield University

 

Abstract:  Many calculus texts describe some of the “pitfalls” that can occur on a graphing calculator. The techniques used to display a graph on a graphing calculator will be outlined.  Based on these graphing calculator parameters, trigonometric identities dependent on the specific graphing calculator will be derived.

 

8:20 - 8:35   A Learning Community for Prospective Elementary School Teachers

                     Donna Beers* and Ellen Davidson, Simmons College

  

Abstract:  This presentation will describe a collaboration between the mathematics and education departments to promote integrative learning for prospective elementary school teachers. The model used was a learning community that combined a mathematics content course for prospective teachers, taught by the mathematics department, with a methods course taught by the education program. In this talk we will briefly address the administrative structuring of the students’ time and credit, as well as the faculty members’ time and workload. We will also address the following questions: What learning outcomes were stated in the course syllabus? What educational experiences or tasks were used to promote each of these learning outcomes? What methods of assessment were used to measure student achievement of the learning outcomes and why? How do we interpret the results of the assessment?  What changes in the learning community design or assessment would we like to make for the future? 

 


Session III - Room 210

 

8:00 - 8:15   Mod (6) Prime Patterms

                     L.J.Balasundarame, Harvard University

 

Abstract:  Of the available prime patterns, the Mod (6) pattern yields all primes > 3. It also provides criteria to determine which of the integers in this pattern will not be primes. By combining the two, the number of primes less than or equal to a given number n has been computed to be in exact agreement with those found. This prime pattern is used to account for the differing number of primes for the same 100 digit interval---25 primes between 0 and 100 whereas 2 primes between 10,000,000 and 10,000,100.

 

8:20 – 8:35   The Goddard Prime Number Theorem Revisited

                      (or: On the Harmonic Frequency of Primes)

                      Tom Kalmar, Sterling College

 

Abstract: By graphing the highest prime factor of say 1-50, you can see and talk about surprising patterns that emerge. (Try it right now!)  This is a way of finding harmonic patterns in the distribution of primes that permits a rapid entry into what the prime number theorem is really about, and is definitely accessible to "ordinary" students.

 

Back to main conference page.